<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Command lines of the future, and simplicity of integration</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pipetree.com/qmacro/blog/2009/08/command-lines-of-the-future-and-simplicity-of-integration/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pipetree.com/qmacro/blog/2009/08/command-lines-of-the-future-and-simplicity-of-integration/</link>
	<description>Reserving the right to be wrong</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2012 18:03:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Twitter Trackbacks for DJ’s Weblog » Blog Archive » Command lines of the future, and simplicity of integration [pipetree.com] on Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://www.pipetree.com/qmacro/blog/2009/08/command-lines-of-the-future-and-simplicity-of-integration/comment-page-1/#comment-473</link>
		<dc:creator>Twitter Trackbacks for DJ’s Weblog » Blog Archive » Command lines of the future, and simplicity of integration [pipetree.com] on Topsy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Aug 2009 00:48:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pipetree.com/qmacro/blog/?p=727#comment-473</guid>
		<description>[...] DJ’s Weblog » Blog Archive » Command lines of the future, and simplicity of integration  www.pipetree.com/qmacro/blog/2009/08/command-lines-of-the-future-and-simplicity-of-integration &#8211; view page &#8211; cached  This is a bit of a hand-wavy post, but I wanted to get my thoughts down. Recently there’s been a spate of interest around interaction with devices, applications and systems … via a chat-style interface. This is nothing new, of course. Bots have existed on the IRC networks for a long time. The venerable Purl, an infobot, was a particular favourite of mine. When instant messaging (IM) came along, we had a new chat interface - which took the form of one-on-one or conference (’group’) chat. With Jabber (XMPP), ‘Chatbot’ was a favourite in the various conference rooms. Back in late 2002, I even wrote about Chatbot in a 2-part series “The Command Line of the Future” (”Is Jabber’s Chatbot the Command Line of the Future?” and The “Command Line of the Future Part 2: Expanding Chatbot’s Repertoire“): &#8212; From the page [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] DJ’s Weblog » Blog Archive » Command lines of the future, and simplicity of integration  <a href="http://www.pipetree.com/qmacro/blog/2009/08/command-lines-of-the-future-and-simplicity-of-integration" rel="nofollow">http://www.pipetree.com/qmacro/blog/2009/08/command-lines-of-the-future-and-simplicity-of-integration</a> &ndash; view page &ndash; cached  This is a bit of a hand-wavy post, but I wanted to get my thoughts down. Recently there’s been a spate of interest around interaction with devices, applications and systems … via a chat-style interface. This is nothing new, of course. Bots have existed on the IRC networks for a long time. The venerable Purl, an infobot, was a particular favourite of mine. When instant messaging (IM) came along, we had a new chat interface &#8211; which took the form of one-on-one or conference (’group’) chat. With Jabber (XMPP), ‘Chatbot’ was a favourite in the various conference rooms. Back in late 2002, I even wrote about Chatbot in a 2-part series “The Command Line of the Future” (”Is Jabber’s Chatbot the Command Line of the Future?” and The “Command Line of the Future Part 2: Expanding Chatbot’s Repertoire“): &mdash; From the page [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

